Literacy and/or Critical Thinking in University Students

Authors

  • Marí­a de Lourdes Román Arjona Universidad La Salle Benavente
  • Eduardo López Hernández Universidad La Salle Benavente
  • Marí­a Elena Morales Vázquez
  • Maricela Sánchez Espinoza Universidad La Salle Benavente

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37646/huella.vi8.487

Keywords:

Literacy , Critical thinking

Abstract

In order to discover how our students at La Salle Benavente University begin critical thinking when addressing study topics, we start with a first moment of approach to learn about the way in which they carry out said process based on the script presented below; which can be applied in the subjects that we teach in the various bachelor's and postgraduate degrees in education.  Let us remember that we will not necessarily work with printed readings, but we can start from practical activities, slide presentations, student presentations, or some other form of work that leads to understanding on the part of the students. We can also resort to the support of one of them in order to systematize all the information generated in the classroom.  The activity in working with learning content begins when the teacher makes a presentation of the topic to be discussed, then asks a series of pre-questions (literal questions) to probe what the students know about said topic, or asks them to define, mention and list some aspects of it. This first stage will allow the teacher to review and update the students' prior knowledge. Later he will give instructions for the next moment in class. If it is a reading, indicate how it will be done (individually or as a team). If it is another form of work, it will indicate the strategy to follow. Next, the teacher or student reporter proceeds to write down the activities carried out by the rest of the group, for example: if it is a slide presentation, if the students ask questions about what is being discussed, if they make analogies, give their point of view, they generate conclusions regarding the information addressed, etc. On the other hand, when trying to read a text: if they carry out a preliminary reading, a second fragmented reading, linear and structural underlining, or ask questions in the margin.  At the end of the previous activity, the teacher can pose questions that lead to the analysis, interpretation, argumentation and reflection of the topic addressed. The diversity of ideas that arise in the group can be used for this and the teacher can provide feedback on them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Argudín Y. (2001) Libro del profesor: desarrollo del pensamiento crítico. México, Plaza y Valdes.

Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey, (2008) Los escabrosos caminos de la literacidad. Material de apoyo Diplomado en Comprensión lectora.

Material de apoyo al Programa de Orientación Educativa (Técnicas de Estudio), DGB/DCA/00/07

Programa de Orientación Educativa, (2007). Guía para el alumno sobre técnicas de estudio. DGB

Sternberg, R. (1999) Estilos de pensamiento. Barcelona, Edit. Paidós.

Stone, M. (2002) La enseñanza para la comprensión vinculación entre la investigación y práctica. Buenos Aires, Paidós.

Recuperación de la información, material de apoyo Diplomado en Comprensión lectora, Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey, (2008).

http://www.educainformatica.com.ar/docentes/tuarticulo/educacion/ausubel/index.html Recuperado el día 14 de febrero del año 2014.

Priego, www.psicopedagogia.com Recuperado el día 14 de Febrero del año 2014.

Published

31-12-2014

How to Cite

Román Arjona, M. de L., López Hernández, E., Morales Vázquez, M. E., & Sánchez Espinoza, M. (2014). Literacy and/or Critical Thinking in University Students. Huella De La Palabra, (8), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.37646/huella.vi8.487

Issue

Section

Reviews