The categorization of the body in the Totonac world
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37646/xihmai.v18i36.591Keywords:
Totonac, human body, body-parts morphemes, human beingAbstract
The aim of this paper is to show how the Totonacs understand their world through the categorization of parts of the body from their language. The results are meant to contribute in the comprehension of how the concept of the human body is crucial to Mesoamerican culture. In regards to this, we analyze the respective morphemes that refer to the human body, but not literally, but also with the purpose of show which parts of it are more recurrent to express abstract concepts and about the daily life through the Totonac language, also, to understand which part of the body represent the human being. The data we analyze were obtained from everyday speech, from the review of texts and through the introspective method, since the authors are part of the Totonac culture. The results show that the face, the belly, and the nose categorize the human being according to the Totonac vision of the world.
Downloads
References
Alcázar, E. (2015). Categorización semántica de las partes del cuerpo en español: Descripción semántica. [Tesis de maestría]. Universitat de Girona. http://hdl.handle.net/10256/11640
Aschmann, H. (1946). Totonac Categories of Smell. Tlalocan, 2(2), 187-189. https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.tlalocan.1946.418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.tlalocan.1946.418
Beck, D. (2004). A grammatical sketch of Upper Necaxa Totonac. Universidad de Alberta.
Bourdin, G. L. (2009). Etnoanatomía. La categorización lingüística del cuerpo humano. Estudios de Antropología Biológica, 14(1), pp. 171-183. https://doi.org/10.22201/iia.14055066p.2009.27239
Castro, C. A. (1986). Enero y febrero: ¡Ahijadero! El banquete de los compadres en la Sierra Norte de Puebla. Universidad Veracruzana.
Chomsky, N. (1969). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
Cisneros, C. (2020). La semántica cognitiva de la anatomía humana y animal en la cultura andina. Boletín de la Academia Peruana de la Lengua, 68(68), pp. 79-92. https://doi.org/10.46744/bapl.202002.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46744/bapl.202002.004
Enríquez, H. (Coord.). (2010). Léxico relativo a las partes del cuerpo. Español-totonaco. Totonaco-español. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.
Gutiérrez, M. & Pitarch, P. (Eds.). (2010). Retóricas del cuerpo amerindio. Iberoamericana-Vervuert. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31819/9783954879168
Howes, D. (2014). El creciente campo de los Estudios Sensoriales. Revista Latinoamericana
de Estudios sobre Cuerpos, Emociones y Sociedad. 6 (15), pp. 10-26.
Hymes, D.H. (1972). “On Communicative Competence” In: J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds). Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. pp. 269-293. Penguin.
Ichon, A. (1973). La religión de los totonacas de la sierra. Instituto Nacional Indigenista.
León-Portilla, M. (1988). Los antiguos mexicanos a través de sus crónicas y cantares. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Levy, P. (1999). From ‘part’ to ‘shape’: Incorporation in Totonac and the Issue of Classification by Verbs. IJAL International Journal of American Linguistics, 65(2), pp. 127-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/466380
López-Austin, A. (2004). Cuerpo humano e ideología. Las concepciones de los antiguos nahuas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas.
MacKay, C. J. (1999). A Grammar of Misantla Totonac. University Utah Press.
McFarland, T. A. (2009). The phonology and morphology of Filomeno Mata Totonac. [Tesis de Doctorado] Universidad de Berkeley. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1mc954tq
McClure, E. F. (1975). Ethnoanatomy: the structure of de domain. Anthropological Linguistics. 17(2), pp. 78-88.
Montes, F. (2014). Adquisición de la semántica de las raíces léxicas topológicas de contacto y separación: ‘poner(se)’ y ‘quitar(se)’ prendas de vestir en el totonaco de Santa Ana, Chumatlan, Veracruz. [Tesis de Maestría]. CIESAS.
Santiago, J. (2020). El aprendizaje del lenguaje como parte de la historia de desarrollo de la persona entre los totonacos de Filomeno Mata, Veracruz. Kataxtu kooko’, katanu tachiwiin. [Tesis de Doctorado]. Universidad Veracruzana.
Santiago, J. (2022). Lo “listo” y lo “tonto” en totonaco: Una aproximación a los sentidos. Balajú. (16), pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.25009/blj.i16.2669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25009/blj.i16.2669
Sapir, E. (1974). El lenguaje y el medio ambiente. En Paul L. Garvin y Yolanda Lastra de Suárez (Eds.), Antología de estudios de Etnolingüística y Sociolingüística (pp. 19-35). UNAM.
O’Meara, C.; Smythe, S. & Majid, A. (2019). The Challenge of Olfactory Ideophones: Reconsidering Ineffability from the Totonac-Tepehua Perspective. International Journal of American Linguistics (IJAL), 85(2), pp. 173-212. https://doi.org/10.1086/701801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/701801
Tino, J. (2013). El uso locativo de los verbos de postura corporal en el lenguaje infantil totonaco. En Lourdes de León Pasquel (Coord.) Nuevos senderos en la adquisición de las lenguas mesoamericanas: estructura, narrativa y socialización. CIESAS.
Tino, J. (2019). Capítulo 4: Tlaan kapaqlhi, que brote bien, tlaan kaxanalh, que florezca bien: los infantes en los rituales orales de las parteras totonacas. En Lourdes De León Pasquel (Coord.) Nacer y crecer en Mesoamérica y Los Andes. Teorías parentales y prácticas de crianza infantil contemporáneas. CIESAS-Casa Chata.
Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, Culture and Cognition. Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195073256.001.0001
Wierzbicka, A. (2007). Bodies and their parts: An NSM approach to semantic typology. Language Sciences (29), pp. 14-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2006.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2006.07.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jorge Tino Antonio, José Santiago Francisco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, which allows others to use the published work as long as they acknowledge the authorship of the work and its first publication in this journal.
Authors may make separate, additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the article in this journal (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to share their work online (for example, via institutional repositories or personal websites) prior to and during the manuscript submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and to increased and more rapid citation of the published work.